ads

,
Showing posts with label HR. Show all posts
Showing posts with label HR. Show all posts
I recently heard from an executive colleague who, thanks to a merger, found herself looking for her next opportunity. Her story, probably depressingly familiar to many of you, was all about the big black hole of rudeness and non-responsiveness that so often sums up employers' attitudes toward candidates.

This colleague, thinking she'd see the healthcare world from a new vantage point, pursued opportunities with consultants, IT vendors, architects and other suppliers who, far from appreciating her solid resume, were like the 3 Stooges of clueless.

So back to a senior health system role she went, WHERE SHE NOW INITIATES AND MANAGES RFPs FOR SOME OF THE VERY SAME COMPANIES who wouldn't talk to her as a candidate, but profess their LOVE for her now that she's got money to spend on their services.

Not gonna happen. Any guesses who's off the RFP list?

I smiled when I heard her story, imagining the BusDev people working hard to grow the revenue pipeline, all the while being quietly sabotaged by their HR team.  Sure, you can't hire everybody, nor should you.  But karma is real and, when given an opportunity, why not make a new friend instead of an enemy?

From the New York Times comes a modest proposal: treat job-hunters like, well, customers!
"...in the whirlwind of daily activity, a business can lose sight that there are real people behind all those résumés. And how the company treats those people, well before any of them become employees, says a lot about it, its brand and its values.

"In the current labor market, where there is a glut of supply, perhaps some companies think they have the upper hand and can afford to skimp on the niceties. They are mistaken, though, because every economic cycle eventually turns, and there is always competition for the best talent, regardless of economic conditions.

"It’s for this reason that human-resources professionals and company leaders need to treat job candidates like customers."
Pay attention to job-hunters? Treat candidates like customers? They're a dime a dozen, so where's the benefit in that, you ask? "Oh but we're terribly busy HR professionals..." you say? Sure, go ahead and kiss that brand promise goodbye, along with the last remaining thimble-full of your business model's growth potential.
"A Stanford Business School case study found that some companies get (the concept of treating job hunters like customers) and capitalize on it. Southwest Airlines, for one, recognizes that employment candidates are not only career customers — but that they could also be, or become, customers of the airline.

"Southwest’s core principles of respect permeate its recruiting, where there is a focus on making sure that no applicant feels inferior or rejected. Many Southwest job applicants have a better experience being rejected by Southwest than they have being hired by other companies. As a result, Southwest gets the best people, and it shows in its superior financial results.

"Another example comes from the food industry, where I recently heard a story about a manager from Nabisco who was attending a human-resources industry conference. When he declared that his company responded to every résumé it received — solicited and unsolicited — he was met with incredulous stares from his peers.

'“Why respond to every résumé when that’s clearly not necessary?” someone asked.

"The Nabisco manager smiled and replied, “ Because — everyone eats cookies."
I love that: "...because everyone eats cookies." And they always remember how you made them feel.

The Takeaway: Has your growth trajectory flattened out? Nosedived? Check how your organization treats job-seekers. Go online and try out your HR Department's "application engine." Investigate how (or, if) you communicate with applicants. Undoubtedly, it's no better than how you treat customers...more's the pity. How can your organization surpass HR's performance when it's THEM supplying the talent? Wouldn't they be the lowest common denominator?

Regrettably, I don't foresee it changing until a generation of HR "professionals" and recruiters spend a few months themselves searching for a new job, sending resumes into the black hole, dealing with recalcitrant web sites. At that point they may figure it out. Until then, as Depeche Mode might have said it, Enjoy the Silence.

More on my feelings about HR, here.



10:55 AM
An article in yesterday's Wall Street Journal asked "Will Health-Care Law Beget Entrepreneurs?"

Will the availability of reasonably-priced insurance through public marketplaces or "exchanges" cause entrepreneurs to strike out on their own, leaving behind the comfort of big company benefits?

It's a good question, albeit one with no clear-cut answer at the moment. It all depends, I guess, on one's definition of "high-functioning exchanges" and "reasonable prices."

Still, it's a question to which large companies ought to be paying close attention. How many people work at jobs simply for the health insurance, jobs they'd leave in a heartbeat to follow their passion if insurance wasn't an obstacle? I don't know for sure, but I'd bet the answer is somewhere between "more than a few" and "a whole heckavu lot."

And those leaving are likely to be those the company wishes would stay - the innovators, the passionistas, those with entrepreneurial drive and burning competitive fires.

They leave and who stays?  The timid, the risk-adverse and the "Yes, but..." crowd.  I guess you can always hope that your competitors are as bad at retaining talent as you are.
2:18 PM
Asks Nick Corcodilos, writing for PBS NewsHour.  It's a great question.  The answer might shape up your HR department in a hurry.

From the article:
A job applicant treated with disrespect can do as much -- if not more -- damage to a company's business as a dissatisfied customer. Do employers really think word doesn't get around?
Maybe hiring managers assume that their HR departments handle all the necessary niceties with applicants. But just how accountable are HR departments? Does this company's public relations department realize that while it's spending millions on good press, the HR department is scuttling it? If you're a hiring manager, and you're not sure how job candidates are treated after they leave your office, please read "Respecting The Candidate."
Your HR department might explain that processing applicants, job offers, hires, and rejection letters is cumbersome. Tell that to your customer who cancels the order that's a month late, or to the prospect who's waiting for a sales rep to return her call.
The technology to keep candidates informed is here. The will isn't. Why? Because job candidates don't cost anything. Companies can get all your professional time they want, for free, without any obligation to you whatsoever.
The article even contains a sample letter requesting payment. Let me know if you try it.
2:53 PM
...too much money.  Wait.  What?

Interesting opinion yesterday from the blogosphere, that healthcare's biggest problem is too much money.  Too many resources, leading to too many people, too much time spent deliberating and too few imperatives toward action.

That's why, in our best leisurely fashion, we approve capital budgets just once a year.  Miss the cycle and it's 'wait 'til next year.'  And that's OK; it's not like it's life & death or anything.

Making the cycle, especially in IT, means launching RFP processes lasting another year and pilot projects lasting one more.  And system-wide rollouts lasting two more...assuming everything goes as planned, which it seldom does.  (Can you count to five?)

That's why off-the-shelf solutions costing 'a little' are rejected in favor of customized (yet corporate-approved) offerings costing twice as much and taking thrice as long.

That's why $8.99 iPhone apps are pooh-poohed as "not serious" and "risky" while the entry-level price for "real" software seemingly starts at $250k, rising rapidly after that.  (Ask me sometime about Voxie vs. the IT geeks.)

That's why our systems for cancer care are confusing messes yet our answer is to add yet another layer of staffing and expense - "Nurse Navigators" they're called.  I guess we'll start on that whole cost reduction and process simplification thing sometime tomorrow. 

And so we have armies of bureaucrats and analysts and process sponsors, technicians, project managers, coordinators and specialists.  We need them all to churn the system...and still we think of ourselves as understaffed.

And thus committees proliferate, PowerPoint becomes the organization's lingua franca, and, typically, the "back of the house" systems (Finance, IT, HR) are far more modern than "front of the house," customer-facing offerings.  When did YOU start offering patients an on-line portal and how many revenue cycle systems came and went before the portal's go-live?

Take away that money, most of the people and all of the committees.  Remove the luxury of time.  What's left? A startup mentality where cheap is better than expensive and free is best of all.  Where costs avoided mean making payroll...or not.  Where new customers this afternoon are better than impressive forecasts two years out.  Where a bias to action always trumps endless discussion.

What's Out: big checks to license Microsoft's crappy software (oops, is my bias showing?)  What's In: free Google apps.

What's Out: elaborate performance monitoring and benchmarking systems.  What's in: free daily tracking from iDoneThis.

Money gives you the luxury of time and lessens the pressure of deliberation.  That's not always a good thing.  And it's why a million little, ankle-biting startups are about to eat hospitals for lunch.  I'm just sayin.'

UPDATE:  Don't believe me?  Read "What We Can Learn From Third-World Health Care" by Pauline W. Chen, M.D., writing in the New York Times:

"The key to their success is an unabashed disregard for some of our most cherished assumptions about what constitutes good care. Instead of providing antibiotics, CT scans and high-tech interventions, Partners in Health considers basic necessities like food and housing as critical components of the group’s medical work. Instead of asking patients to travel miles to the only clinic and see only the doctor or nurse, they train cadres of community health workers who can monitor, administer and advise in the heart of local villages and in people’s homes.
"Applied to organizations in the United States, this approach has proved startlingly effective, as the Prevention and Access to Care and Treatment, or PACT, program has demonstrated. PACT targets some of the poorest and sickest patients with H.I.V. and other chronic illnesses in the greater Boston area. Just like Partners in Health, PACT relies extensively on community health workers who are trained in tasks like helping patients take their medications and make it to clinic appointments as well as reviewing their pantries and teaching them to prepare healthy meals. Applying these broad definitions of care, PACT has significantly decreased the number of emergency room visits and life-threatening opportunistic infections, cut hospitalization rates by 60 percent and yielded a 16 percent savings for Medicaid."
8:21 AM
I'm wasn't sure 2011's waning days needed yet another list of some kind, but Harvard Business Review's list of audacious ideas is pretty good.  Why audacious ideas?

"(Because) even though (businesses are) sitting on $2 trillion in cash, they’re risk-averse, strategically incremental, and notably lacking in fresh ideas.
"We think this stinks. The world needs invention and daring now more than ever.  Now is the time for audacity, not austerity. "
So here's HBR's list (the full article requires registration.)
  • Tackling the World Economy
    • Give People Shares of GDP, by Robert J. Shiller
    • Double Down on Start-ups, by Bruce Gibney and Ken Howery
    • Partner with China in Afghanistan, by Wayne Porter
    • Enroll the World in For-Profit Universities, by Parag Khanna and Karan Khemka
  • Tackling Science Challenges
    • Give NASA a Real Mission, by Gregg Easterbrook
    • Declare 20% of the Ocean Off-Limits, by Enric Sala
    • Electrify the Bottom of the Pyramid, by Arun Majumdar
  • Tackling Social Problems
    • Die the Way You Want To, by Ellen Goodman
    • Pay Businesses to Keep People Out of Prison, by Eric Schmidt
    • Grow More Apples and Less Corn, by Ellen Gustafson
  • Tackling Business Problems
    • Stop Tying Pay to Performance, by Bruno S. Frey and Margit Osterloh
    • Crowdsource Management Reviews, by Linda A. Hill and Kent Lineback
    • Stop Collecting Customer Data, by Doc Searls
Were it up to me, there's about 10 ideas on the list that beg for immediate implementation.  Or, at a minimum, pointed questions of each Presidential candidate (including the incumbent.)

Let the arguing and ox-goring begin.


3:30 PM